to. The majority of one-spacers, on the other hand, read at pretty much the same speed either way. . It seems like the debate over two-spacing, a vestige of typewriting, should be resolved by now. And so the rules of typography fell back into chaos. A 1998 experiment that suggested it did not matter. (Putting two spaces after a comma, if you're wondering, slowed down reading speed, so don't do that.) The study's authors concluded that two-spacers in the digital age actually have science on their side, and more research should be done to "investigate why reading is facilitated when. They could not get used to seeing just one space after a period. Typing two spaces after a period is totally, completely, utterly and inarguably wrong, Farhad Manjoo wrote. But then, at the end of the 20th century, the typewriter gave way to the word processor and the computer and modern variable width fonts.
And so the rules of typography fell into chaos. Anything more than a single space between sentences was too much. Researchers looked at eye movements specifically when participants read areas of text where the periods occurred: the word right before the punctuation, the punctuation, and the word right after. Johnson, one of the authors, told Douglas that the fixed-width font was standard for eye-tracking tests, and the benefits of two-spacing should carry over to any modern font.
One space or two spaces in college essays
Its unclear how this would affect the results of the study. Sixty participants were asked to read 20 separate character essay macbeth paragraphs, on average about eight sentences long. Ob viously, thereneed to be standards. Actually, Lifehacker's one-space purist Nick Douglas pointed out some important caveats to the study's conclusion. But since everyone tended to spend less time staring at periods that were followed by a bit of extra white space, science has ensured that this debate will rage for another period of human history.