would say that the theory itself is good and have good logical behind it but the effect it would have on believers would be devasting. This is really your own opinion but i would say that it fits into religious stdies as it means that people can stop going round in circles and start to only believe things which are obviously true. Language games (although i think i would use this in conclusion instead as a weakness)- wittgeinstein seeing as" - wittgeinstein - people see things differently because of their beliefs. Ayer rejects the link between his argument and those of atheists or agnostics. people have strong views on God, to talk about him makes people feel love and happiness it keeps them going.
Ayer 2 essay, examine the argument and/or the interpretation in the passage.
Do you agree with the ideas expressed?
Is it not part of human nature to believe in some deity? Part B 1/2- Almost the same as paragraph one although turn it around so that it is about the non-existence of God as opposed to the existence of God. People interprete things differently. Also bring in religious experience and say that if we were to follow this theory than people around the world who feel a sense of God guiding them will no longer feel this. Examine the argument and/or the interpretation in the passage. Indeed, Ayer identifies these 'philosophers' almost to differentiate the non- religious believers from those that adopt popular religious reasoning. The effect this argument has on religion and life in general. I have took some ideas from yesterday, Sorry i hope whoever it was does not mind. Criticising people for using R/exp as proof for God.
To him, because philosophers use skill of reasoning and analysis they are able to recognise that any attempts to prove the existence of God are trivial as they fail to use reasoning, and instead use intuition. critising argujments for the existence of God (design, cosmo etc).
Inconvenient truth summary essay, Virtue essay, Leadership in apple inc essay conclusion, Need a hook for my essay,