(Conclusions and Recommendation). . Were there any obvious biases? Following is the list of criteria to evaluate (critique) a research article. How was the data analyzed? Were all eligible groups sampled?
Following is the list of criteria to evaluate (critique) a research article.
Pleas e note that you should first summarize the paper and then evaluate different parts.
The qualitative paper chosen for the critique is a grounded theory design and the research terms and terminology associated with this method such.
Reading, Analysing, and Critiquing Research Papers.
Using a Scie ntific Journal Article to Write a Critical Review (University of Guelph).
Are the suggestions for future action based on practical significance or on statistical significance only,.e., has the author avoided confusing practical and statistical significance? Are the tests of significance interpreted using the appropriate degrees of freedom? Design and Procedure. . This is a long list of questions.
If necessary, are variables directly or operationally defined? Please note that you should first summarize the paper and then evaluate different parts. Surely the article will be of good quality if it has made it through the peer review process? Do the implications discussed form an empirical or theoretical rationale for the hypotheses which follow? Percentages have been used to disguise small sample sizes.