this readily, there would always be some groups that choose not to involve themselves with. For example, it took just over 277 tests before the scientists can create the first clone. Is cloning morally acceptable? Wilmut has been noted as saying, «People are not thinking this thing carefully. The likelihood of human cloning comes from ideas of those who foresee manywonderous prospects for the procedure. For example, if a couple lost a child they loved dearly and could not reproduce naturally, cloning that child could be an alternative. References: Adams,.,., The Well-Born Science, leadership and management essays in nursing Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. Many fear that in the hands of a powerful dictator, super intelligent withsuperhuman strength could develop and take over. That is not appropriate.» He continued that using this technique on humans would be «quite inhumane» and that he was glad that he lives in a country where embryo experimentation is illegal Scientist» 1). Animals that have been cloned run the risk of being infertile and having a lower life expectancy.
The child would be designed by the parent to serve some purpose. Universally, therefore, cloning should be banned in order to preserve the natural functions which we were made to perform as human beings. Although there is no proof thatsuch a procedure can be performed on the cells of a human, similar procedures have the odyssey kingfisher essay introduction already been done on other mammals. Sex «creates new gene combinations that confer new strengths, especially to disease» (Economist 20). From that point on, scientists were hooked. There are two procedures that can be called «cloning embryo cloning and adult DNA cloning.
Fall of the romanov dynasty essay
Great depression essay rubric
My favorite brother essay